Learning to Compose
Some great performers can read and play excellent renditions of compositions,
but think they cannot improvise. Some improvisers can play over music written by
other composers, but think they could never compose a piece themselves. However, writing a song is very much a craft, and
whatever one already knows about music, from advanced theory to simple
appreciation of a good rhythm, provides valuable material to shape into a piece. Finding Themes and Melodies
Lesson 1: Choosing A Subject And Keeping It
Simple
As you can see this is the first lesson!
That's why it starts with the boring part... But if you came this far,
you probably won't be bored to death by reading the rest too!
Let's kick off!
The next points must be kept in mind while
writing lyrics:
One of the first difficulties songwriters experience
is choosing the right subject. It can be a difficult task; in fact, I think
it's half the work of writing lyrics! Sometimes I can't find a good subject
and my production in writing lyrics completely stops. But if I have found
one (inspiration!!!) I often write the lyrics for a song in about 15 minutes.
But if you can't find a subject and start writing anyway it might take
days to get something appropriate, 'tough it will never be as good as the
lyrics that "struck like lightning! Another advantage of writing your lyrics
on the moment you have inspiration is that you will write your lyrics as
if you are speaking . I come back on that later while discussing how
to keep your lyrics simple.
Lesson 2: The Use Of Repetitions
Ever wondered how all those singers manage to learn
all those lyrics by heart??? Well, one thing's for sure, you don't have
to be a graduate to be a singer, but a good memory can come in handy! But
fortunately there are some tricks to let that singer sing the lyrics you
want! In this month's lesson I'll try to explain how the use of repetetive
parts in a songtext can help remembering a song. We will see that there
are two sorts of repetitions:
I'll explain the difference between these two later
on this lesson. But before kicking off I can tell you already that there
are quite a lot of advantages to use repetitions.
These advantages which we will discuss later, might
seem to be unimportant, but consider this: Why wouldn't you make it yourself
easier as a songwriter to write those lyrics?? After all, it's not very
much fun going though all those dictionaries in your head searching for
those words to fit! Why don't go easy and use your own words!! And when
you consider it might change your song into an alternative national anthem
just by using those repetitions you would be crazy to do it the hard way!
The name says it all: Literal Repetitions are literal
repetitions of a part of the lyrics. One very much used example is called
the Chorus. It's one of those old-fashioned elements of a
song which hardly no-one dares to let go. I wonder why (NOT!!). The chorus
is the most important part of the song, whether you like it or not. It's
that part that will almost always be first remembered of a song. Notice
that all the classics are songs built around a good sturdy chorus. They
can come in all kinds of forms: a chorus doesn't need to be very complicated
at all. Take a look at the lyrics of one of the most catchy choruses ever:
the one of the song Child in Time by Deep Purple. Gillan probably took
a day off when the lyrics of this chorus were written but it sure proofs
the fact that a chorus is good as long as it's recognizable throughout
a song.
Whether one is just starting out composing or has more experience, often the
same questions will arise. For example, how does a composer invent good material
or melodies in the first place? One important thing to keep in mind is that
almost everybody has not just a few, but thousands of useable musical ideas
floating around in their head, ready to be used in a piece. The tiniest ideas
can sustain huge works. For example, just thinking of the interval of a major
sixth, playing it perhaps from E to C#--this in itself could be a theme, an
idea. Maybe there are some passing tones played in between, making it more
interesting, or maybe there is a “tail” or second half of the idea, such as C#
to A. But the main point is that this one small idea alone could be a theme,
which could then be developed using the tools below.
The number of places to look for these ideas is endless. There is no need to
question a source of inspiration—it could come from many places, such as an
aspect of theory that appeals to the composer. Maybe a composer likes the sound
of a major third, so he or she plays with it and brings out the tone and color
of the interval. Or ideas could come from a feeling a composer gets from a
certain place or person. The fog setting by the ocean, for example, could create
a memory, a thought, a mood, an idea. A composer could express this in
music—maybe just a pair of notes, such as a dissonance of a minor second, could
capture that feeling. As well, ideas could come from works by other
musicians—maybe the composer remembers an interesting phrase in another piece,
and although he does not copy that phrase, he creates one similar, that is both
reminiscent of the old phrase, yet incorporates new ideas, perhaps ones that are
more modern. Or if the composer also improvises, he could use phrases from his
own improvisations.
In general, a theme can come from any of these sources and many more, creating
an exciting range of possibility. As long as the theme is distinct, and
interesting to the composer, usually it is a good theme to try to use. Clarity,
memorability, and interest are generally more valuable than complexity or even
length.
Solving the Problem of Development
Once the composer has a theme or musical idea he or she likes, another main
question is, how does one develop the melody into a song? A common problem is
that there is this great melody sitting there, inspiring, interesting,
catchy—and yet the composer does not know how to do anything with it, how to
turn it into a song. At this point the composer needs to understand the “craft”
of composition, which involves a number of tools for shaping the song. While the
tools ultimately are to be used in an “inspired” way, they can also be learned
and used very academically, as in just shaping a song that “makes sense,”
without necessarily worrying at first whether it is really unique or an
extraordinary song.
The general idea is that there are a number of tools the composer can use to go
from point A to point B, to develop the theme, to shed light on what he wants to
express, to create a “complete”-sounding song, etc. Much of these tools could be
likened in some ways to mathematics. In math, the numbers one is using often
change, but the rules for working with those numbers stay the same. If one is
adding a group of numbers, one sums the digits in the ones column, carries the
number in the tens of the sum, adds the numbers in the tens column, etc. In the
same way, when composing a song, the themes may change, but oftentimes the same
basic rules of the songwriting craft can be followed, to take that theme where
the composer wants it to go.
For example, one tool is the basic AABA structure of a melody. Many pop songs
are written this way. First, the idea is presented,
such as that E-C#-A major sixth idea mentioned earlier. Second, the idea is
presented again, very much the same as the first time, but perhaps with an
alteration in the phrase, an added passing tone, or a modified harmony. Third,
suspense is introduced, either by altering the idea, or just bringing in a
different contrasting idea. Fourth, the composer returns to the first idea,
which gives the melody a feeling of conclusion. This could be the structure for
the first eight bars.
Moreover, just as in math, this structure could be used to shape any number of
melodies into a piece. At a basic level, the composer can put in to the formula
his fresh musical idea—like the dissonance bringing up the mood of the foggy
shore, or any simple but interesting melody—run this formula, and out comes a
reasonable melody. The quality and interest-level of the melody depends on many
factors, such as the composer’s musicianship, knowledge of theory, creativity,
etc. But at least by using standard formulas, the composer can generally shape
understandable, usable melodies.
Another tool is creating a contrasting B section, or a second melody, for the
tune. Again, one common structure is to play the melody once or often twice, and
then play the second melody. The B section could be in a contrasting key, such
as the major key if the A section was minor; or it could introduce a
complementary but different musical concept, such as the swing section in A
Night in Tunisia, that contrasts the main latin melody, or the second theme in
Beethoven’s Fur Elise that follows the main first theme. Using the second theme
or section helps to add development, to bring the listener into a different
place in the music, to shed more light on the theme and the ideas expressed,
etc.
Other tools involve incorporating any number of other theory ideas or techniques
used by other composers. These often could include the techniques of
contrapuntal variation, such as inversion,
augmentation, diminution, etc. They could include shifting keys. They could
include using classical harmonies, baroque counterpoint, or popular chord
progressions. This article does not attempt to detail this range of
possibilities, partly because it is up to each composer him or herself to
explore the music and discover the possibilities that work for him or her.
Listening to a jazz piece, flipping through a score of a Beethoven sonata,
hearing how ‘60’s rock musicians make their points in the music—all provide
tools and ideas for building the craft of music writing.
Thus, by building a knowledge of these tools, and understanding ways to put
together musical ideas, one can learn to compose music. While inspiration is
important for creating an idea, basic knowledge of the craft is also important.
Music making is generally a combination of these various understandings put
together—inspiration, structure, tools, ideas, rhythm, and energy are frequently
all used simultaneously during the composition process.
The use of Repetitions
These include:
Now don't you all start yelling at me saying:
"Man, go to kiddies class!" I know there are plenty of people perfectly
capable to write good (and complicated) lyrics, in fact I'm one of them
hahaha but this course is supposed to learn you all some tips and tricks
to make the job easier...
So now we figured this out I guess we're ready
know to dive deeper into this material. Put on your helmets, fasten your
seatbelts and GO!!!
Literal Repetitions
Usually a chorus doesn't change during a song,
and if it changes, it only changes slightly and it will probably be at
the end of the song. An example of this can be seen in the song Autumn
which we discussed in the first lesson. Notice that the last chorus has
changed, but very slight: "they" changes into "we", that's all. A chorus
shouldn't change too much, otherwise it won't be recognized as the chorus
anymore.
Of course, the music is an important factor in
recognizing a chorus, but remember that a good songtext is still interesting
and meaningfull without the music!!
Remember when you start to change a chorus, be
sure the change is logical. You can change a chorus more drastically without
sacrificing the link with the other choruses, but you will need to use
the so-called seemingly repetitions for that. I will discuss that later....
It is also possible to use literal repetitions
in a verse. A lot of the advantages will count for this option too. By
repeating lines or parts of lines it will be much easier to build a complete
songtext and it should enhance the logic of the lyrics. But watch out for
the pitfall of making your song too simplistic!! Many songwriters make
the mistake to repeat large parts of text, and thus making the song dull
or even worse: hard to understand. This trick might work in a poem but
it usually doesn't work in a song, and certainly not a rock-song. Use it
sparsly and subtle.
An example can be found in the following exerpt
of the song "Live it Up" which I wrote for the second cassette of the Stag,
named "Winds of Pain".
Live it Up
1)
The life you live, just seems alright,
but if you bust the shell, you can smell the
stench inside.
you're just filled up, with all your happy memories,
you're living in the past, but you never get
yourself released.
3)
The life you live, just ain't alright,
and you know, you rot away inside.
Just enjoy all your happy memories,
but don't forget to live your live, and never
get yourself released.
As you can see, there are quite a few literal repetitions! I coloured the repetitions for convenience. Some parts of lines from the first verse have been copied to the third, after a slight change. Take a look at the tails of the lines of these verses: they are almost identical. This is a dangerous trick because the result might be you ending up with a song which seems to have nothing to say. To avoid this, keep in mind the following rules:
If you do it alright the audience/reader wouldn't
notice at all the verses are almost identical. They will only think the
last part sounded familiar (if they aren't drunk, stoned or deaf of course!!!)
and that was just your intention, wasn't it???
Using literal repetitions in a verse can be okay
but it's better to use seemingly repetitions. As you will see later, the
above example also contains examples of seemingly repetitions. So I guess
it's time to tell you more about that now!
As you could see, literal repetitions aren't very
difficult to use. In fact, everybody is using (or misusing...) them. Choruses
will be the main part of a song until another Beethoven stands up so we
will be using it in some form for decades to come. How different are seemingly
repetitions... These aren't as easy to use as literal repetitions! As you
could read between the lines above, seemingly repetitions have the same
effect on a song as literal repetitions, but this effect is achieved in
a different and much more complicated way. This kind of repetitions come
in the class of "things that spice up lyrics", if you know what I mean.
The problem with seemingly repetitions is that
they must be used very, very subtle. Use them too much and they will become
just plain literal repetitions. I'll try to explain what I mean with seemingly
repetions.
A seemingly repetition is a style-form used by
a songwriter to make the audience/reader "feel" te relation between two
(or more) parts of a songtext. Was this relation rather clear when using
literal repetitions, using seemingly ones results in far less clear relations
in the songtext. This is due to the fact that seemingly repetitions hardly
(or not at all) use copied parts of a songtext. The relation exists because
the contents of the text make out the repetetion and thus makes the relation
between the text-parts.
Tough eh?? Well, not as tough as it looks. I'll
try to explain it using one of my songs. This one is previously unreleased.
You can hear a sample of this song by clicking on the picture below. It
will download a soundfile recorded mono in 8 bits PCM-format. I chose this
format to keep downloading-times within reasonable limits while enabling
you to hear a large part of music. I wrote this song in the "dying days"
of the Stag and it's the original demo I used on my 4-track home-studio,
which I always use to give the bandmembers an idea of a new song. I'm not
a singer so pardon me for that; but after all, we're talking lyrics now...
Demon Dreams
1)
In the darkest hour, I hear a voice calling me,
a soothing sound from a world beyond, it calls
my soul and makes it free.
Whispered promises of heavenly peace, seducing
me to believe
there's love in the voice that's calling me.
When she calls my name, I feel like riding the
rainbow.
Dazing trough the skies,to get to her and drown
me in her eyes.
When she calls my name.......etc.
3)
When the night comes down, I fear the voice to
call me.
There's something deep inside of me, that stands
up to this slavery.
But when the winds carries out her voice, and
my fear parishes in lust,
I betray the one I love, and deny all that I
trust.
When she calls my name.....etc.
Chorus:
Dreams are illusion, tell me why you're calling
me.
Dreams are illusion, tell mee why you're soothing
me.
Dreams are illusion, tell me why you're hurting
me.
Dreams are illusion, don't want the morning dew
to moist my eyes no more.
For this example I used the entire songtext because you can only "feel" the relation between different parts of the text when you read the whole song. The seemingly repetition is very subtle here and is achieved by using equivalents. These equivalents are the words (or strings of words) that make the link(s) more clearly; without them it would be more difficult to recognize a seemingly repetition. Mind that I use the word equivalent a little free: an equivalent usually is a word that has the same meaning as another word, like for example dog and hound. Here I mean with equivalent a word or string of words that point to the same subject. Let me explain by some examples from Demon Dreams:
Note that seemingly repetitions usually appear at
the same place in a songtext in different verses, although that's not necessarily
the case. The examples also proof that seemingly repetitions make it easier
to understand the lyrics. In fact, the same thing is said twice in different
words, so the change people will understand it is twice as big.
I hope you have an idea now of what seemingly
repetitions are and how to use them. As you can see, it's sometimes hard
to tell where a literal repetition ends and a seemingly one starts. As
a rule of thumb: as soon as you "feel" the repetition (and the link established
by it) rather than you "see" it, it's a seemingly one.
We're almost at the end of this month's lesson. I
know this one wasn't easy but songwriting usually isn't easy at all, except
for the lucky few. To make it up to you I made a tabel where you can see
the advantages and disadvantages of the forms of repetitions I discussed
in this lesson.
| Sort of Repetition | Advantages | Disadvantages | Remarks |
| Literal Repetition | *Easy to use
*Makes lyrics easier to remember |
*Danger of looking "cheap"
*Commonly used |
*Used most commonly in choruses
*Often misused by lack of writing-skills |
| Seemingly Repetition | *Helps reader to understand difficult lyrics
*Adds structure to lyrics |
*Difficult to use
*Danger of "falling back" to plain literal repetitions |
*Makes you "feel" the link between textparts |
The above list could be much longer if you please. Send me your comments about this, because while experimenting with it you will certainly encounter more advantages and disadvantages of using repetitions. For myself, I am convinced of the fact that the advantages are of more weight than the disadvantages and therefor I'd suggest to try things out in your lyrics. Especially the seemingly repetitions can be a real burden when trying them out for the first time but practicing a lot will make it more easy and natural to use. After all, consider this: how often do we have to explain things twice or even more just to get the message clear in real life??
Lesson 3: Adding Rhythm To Your Lyrics
This pattern is a very basic one. Advantage of this is that it's rather easy to use. But the big disadvantage of this one is that your lyrics may become quite boring and predictable when you misuse this pattern-form. This pattern can be described as words written in a very steady, regular rhythmic pulse. Rap-artists really love this pattern and use it a lot. If used correctly it can achieve a very hypnotic or hectic effect. It can make your lyrics sound like a machine-gun! Therefor, this pattern is used most commonly for uptempo songs and/or lyrics, like rap. But it can also be used for less fast songs.
As I said before, you must take care with using the
regular pattern too much. You might begin to sound predictable when you
use that pattern too much! This is where you can start using the regular,
but broken rhythmic pattern.
Basically it's the same as the pattern we discussed
first, but it's kind of cut in pieces. The lyrics use a regular pattern
but every now and then rests, accelerations and stuff like that are built
in. The trick is not to do it too much so that the lyrics sound as if they
don't have any rhythm at all. The effect, if done properly, is that you
keep a very rhythmic songtext that doesn't sound to dull or stiff.
The third pattern is different from the first two
in a way that this pattern sounds rhythmic in a more poetic way. The rhythm
seems to flow along the lines and is already very obvious while only reading
the lyrics, as is the fact with good poetry. This pattern tends to be more
connected to the melody and feel of a song rather than the rhythm of the
music. It's often far less mechanical and much more fluid, thus demanding
fluid, less harsh music.
As I stated before, you can find rhythm in everything
and so also in poems. While reading a poem you actually are forced to read
it in a certain manner, a certain rhythm. If you ignore that "force" the
poem sounds very clumsy. This is also the case with the sluggish, loose
rhythmic pattern. Because it's rhythm resembles that of a poem, it forces
you to obey to it's rules and follow! If you don't, the lyrics will sound
hopeless out of pace with the music...
This kind of rhythmic pattern is best for improvising. Because of the loose feel of it the singer/reader can feel invited to give the lyrics his own interpretation. A good improvisor can thus give the song an extra dimension. But it's very important that the improvisor doesn't loose track of the pattern.
To make things more clear I've made a table
where you can see most of the information about the most common rhythmic
patterns I've given you in this lesson at a glimpse.
| Common Rhythmic Patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of rhythmic pattern | Advantages | Disadvantages | Remarks |
| Simple, regular | Easy to use | Danger of becoming boring and predictable | Suitable for fast songs. Hypnotic, mechanical and tight effect |
| Regular, but broken | Not too difficult to use, refreshing | If used too much rhythm disappears | Creates illusion of different patterns while using just one |
| Sluggish, loose | Pattern already interesting without music, good to improvise on | Pattern possibly difficult to interpret by reader | "Takes over" the song; music must follow the lyrics |
After all your efforts to build rhythmic patterns
in the lines of your songtext, you definetly don't want to ruin it by loosing
track of the overall view of the lyrics. Rhythmic patterns are very important
but they don't stand to themselves; they are part of the total lyrics and
they can only play their role if you manage to organize all those patterns
in such a way that all those rhythmic pieces come together.
As I stated before mirroring
can come in very handy when writing lyrics without knowing the music yet.
But mirroring is also a useful tool to give your song that finishing touch
when it comes to rhythm.
It's very important that the audience recognizes
parts of your song. Most of the time they will hear your song for the first
time or during difficult conditions, for instance during a concert or a
noisy party. So if you bomb them with pattern after pattern they will soon
loose track! Mirroring your verses can help avoiding this. When you build
a pattern in the second line of the first verse, and you use the same pattern
in every second line of the other verses, the audience will recognize it
and thereby get the chance to appreciate it more.
Using this technique brings a distinct structure
to your song. This structure is very important to make your song actually
a song instead of a collection of lines, rhythms, riffs etc. etc. This
structure is also important to make composing the music easier; a songtext
which lacks a certain structure is a horrible thing to put on music!
A special kind of rhyme is rhyme that occurs within
a line of a song/poem. This form can occur in lyrics that use the normal
rhyming-methods but also in lyrics and poems that don’t seem to rhyme at
all and lack all kinds of patterns at the end of the lines. This kind of
rhyme is one of those secret things in a song that can make it much more
interesting.
This kind of rhyme can be divided into two sub-forms,
normal rhyme and begin-rhyme.
Normal rhyme
This form uses the same rules as normal rhyme,
which means the words sound like each other. This form can produce a very
special effect: if used properly it completely focuses all the attention
of the audience at once, and thus has the same effect as a shout in a bedroom
full of sleeping people. Now this is a rather clumsy comparison, who would
compare his lyrics to a bedroom full of sleeping people?? But I think you
know what I mean....
Take a look at this example taken from "The Widow's
Game", released on The Stag's last cassette "Reset". In the first line
of the third verse the audience's attention is drawn back from the instrumental
break to the lyrics by starting with rhyme within one line:
The seduction is strong while she
sings her song, I'm frozen by her spell
She weaves her web closing in to me, still have
my soul to sell
Begin-rhyme
This kind of rhyme doensn’t seem to rhyme at
all because the words only use the same first consonants. An example could
be: “the sun is shining on their severe burned
backs”. None of the words in this line does actually rhyme but they
sound like they are connected because of the same first consonant. Another
example can be seen in the above example from "the Widows Game"...
For both of these special types of rhyme counts that if used properly you can create a special effect that jumps right out of the rest of the line or even the whole song. Used in the right combination with rhythm it can also produce a very hypnotic effect. But be careful wth using these rhyme-forms: they can easily be overdone!
As we already noticed, rhyme is easy to use and abuse.
To write good rhyme is merely a matter of taste. Because of that, you will
always encounter people who will tell you your rhyme isn't good. (Usually
they will use other terms to tell you this...). You will never be able
to get around this problem, because everybody has a different taste...
Because of this it's very important to make some
decisions before you start writing a new song. You will have to decide
IF you are going to use rhyme, and if so, what kind of rhyme in the sense
of style. It's also important to think about why you are going to use rhyme.
To help you with this, look at the following checklist:
This list will help you with your decision how to start setting up the rhyme for your lyrics. After these decisions the real work begins. And when the hard labour is done, don't forget to be objective. After that, all you can do is hope people will like what you have written.
Rhyme can help you with bringing structure to your
song. It can also be used to make the lyrics more interesting for those
people who like to play with language. But rhyme can also make your song
very boring and predictable. The challange is to stick as much as possible
to the rules yet to make it look as fresh and new as possible.
As always, this is easy to say but very hard
to achieve! But there are some do's and don'ts that will help you to accomplish
this...
Now that we know more about the different types of
rhyme and their occurences, we'll have to find out how to make those words
rhyme. Rhyme is one of those things that can become a disturbing factor
while writing your lyrics: just at the moment you are inspired you can’t
find that certain word that rhymes... To get around these kinds of problems
everybody develops some personal tricks. Here are some of mine, plus additional
information which probably will make the job easier for you and help you
make your lyrics more interesting.
Lesson 5: The Structure - A Global View
If there’s one element that you can’t avoid to use
then it’s the verse. Every song has at least one verse. The reason why
this statement’s true is the fact that a verse can have any shape you want
it to have; long, short, monotone, irregular etc. etc.
The main purpose of the verse is to make the
song’s structure more clearly. Therefor it’s better to write the verse
in such a way that it’s recognizable as a verse; give it at least some
structure and let it come back later in the song.
The verse is the part of the song that “tells
the story”. It’s one part with the lyrics. The verse is definitly NOT the
part of the song where it all happens musically. So save the fireworks
for later! When writing the music for your verses consider the following:
As you can see, writing a verse isn’t the hardest part of writing a song. The only difficult thing about it is making it not too difficult!
Writing a good chorus on the other hand is very difficult!
(Who ever told you writing song’s is easy?). The chorus is the part of
the song that’s supposed to stick in people’s heads and never to get out
of it again. To accomplish this you don’t necessarily have to bear a name
like Jagger/Richards, Lennon/McCarthy or Adams. But it wouldn’t hurt you
if you’d listen to some songs written by these guys. They are/were capable
to write choruses who are remembered by millions of people for many years.
You don’t have to like their songs to admit they indeed can write
songs and especially choruses...
Choruses generally follow these rules:
By the way, the picture (you should see the original...)
is made by Henny Witkamp, a great artist from Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
He also paints on order, so if you need a logo, decor-painting or whatever,
please let me know by email and I'll bring you into contact with him.
Like stated above there are a few elements to help avoid your songs to become predictable. These are instrumental breaks, bridges, hooks en outro’s. In fact all these elements have the same purposes, like:
Be careful while using these elements not to make them become the major part of your song. Just use them to spice things up. Overdoing might change your song into a blurr of musical fragments. These elements will be discussed more thoroughly in an upcoming lesson.
The most ordinary elements of a song’s structure
were part of the big success of all those 50’s, 60’s and 70’s songs. In
those days it seemed as it was almost impossible to get a record-deal without
writing a repertoire that contained only well built songs. Take the Beatles
for instance, masters in defining a song’s structure.
Maybe the strict rules about a song’s structure
in those early days of rock&roll were part of the upraise of the so
called Guitar Hero’s; guys (no girls in those days, sorry...) who couldn’t
hardly wait to get on stage to do their thing... As kind of a backwards
effect on this you see nowadays people are getting back to the basics and
dropping all those lenghty guitar-solo’s, so we’re right back at the beginning
as far as this is concerned... But more of this story in an upcoming lesson!
Classics in pophistory have (almost always) one thing in common: they are built around a distinct songskeleton based on the 3 main elements of a song: intro, verse and chorus. This resulted in short, clear and easy to remember songs. Songwriters in those days used some tricks to avoid their songs to become predictable. One very popular trick was transforming the key (oops, technical term...) of the song in the last verse and/or chorus. This was done so many times that nowadays it often sounds outdated. But of course feel free to experiment with it!
Another trick from the past is the use of
a so called bridge. We already discussed the bridge in one of the lessons
about the lyrics, but of course there’s no bridge without something to
flow beneath it, in this case the music!
Many classics have a built-in bridge to give
the audience kind of an injection; it attracts the attention and refreshens
the song. The bridge is still a good thing to use in a song; because in
fact it’s a (very small) second theme in a song you can make it sound the
way you want it. Therefor the danger of sounding outdated isn’t there.
There is a lot more to say about bridges in a
song: we’ll get back to this in another lesson. But be sure to write your
bridges in a matter that they still fit in the general structure of the
song.
There are various methods of writing/composing intro’s, which can also be combined in many ways. This results in various types of intro’s. Let’s take a closer look at some of these types. Please keep in mind there are as many methods and types as you can come up with. There are no strickt rules, so just use the methods you like best.
As we could see in the previous lesson, it’s a good idea to build your song’s intro with parts taken from the rest of the song. Some advantages of this approach are:
Please remember the fact that one of the characteristics
of a good intro is the fact itself that it’s a preview of the song, as
stated in the previous lesson. However, though this method is easier because
you don’t have to come up with a new musical idea for your intro, it will
definetly test your arranging-skills!
Arranging in fact is not much more than ordering
all those great ideas you have for that particular song you are working
on into a hitsong. This sounds easier than it is! Arranging is a skill
which is lacked by many musicians who are great improvisers. Not having
the ability to arrange will be one of the major reasons why such musicians
will never be good composers. To put it simple: having great ideas doesn’t
mean you are a great songwriter...
Building your intro out of parts of the rest
of your song is a good way to practise arranging your entire song; in fact
it’s the same job, only on a smaller scale. Some will find this is easier,
others will prefer arranging a whole song prior to arranging an intro.
Fact is arranging an intro will give you far less room for improvising.
Don’t make the mistake of just picking some pieces
and putting them together into the intro. This intuïtional approach
works fine on many other aspects of songwriting, but it will often result
in rubbish when writing an intro. Better is it to evaluate the parts of
music you have already to see what part is catchy enough to be the intro
yet not too stunning it will make the rest of the song an anti-climax.
Considering these remarks it seems a good idea to save writing your intro
for last, odd as it may seem!
This brings us to a totally different method
of writing intro’s which will be discussed next.
This is a totally different approach to writing your intro’s. Although you will see it’s the opposite of the previous discussed method in almost every way, this method might be very usefull. Maybe this approach is most often used, because of the fact it’s a totally intuïtional way of writing intro’s. Using this method, you'd usually start writing your song with the intro itself. Many songwriters that prefer writing intuïtional use the same method for writing their intro’s. Two major advantages of this way of working are:
Intro’s written using this method will never be complicated,
unless you’re a genius, but often that’s the strong part of intro’s written
this way. They will be simple, short and to the point, the ideal intro
for certain types of songs. AC/DC for instance are masters in writing intro’s
like these, which became very clear already when they released their first
hit Whole Lotta Rosie.
Of course this method has disadvantages as well...
Used improperly you will write nothing but predictable intro’s, leaving
little or no room for the rest of the song. Remember, an intro should make
people curious, not tell them everything about the things to come! Avoiding
this you will find this method very convenient to use, especially if you
are not too good an arranger and/or if you are just starting songwriting.
This method is very dangerous to use because of various
reasons. But if you take good care, using it may result in very interesting
masterpieces of music, almost little songs on their own. They can be compared
to those beautiful, painted capitols in those medieval bibles: those pictures
often were nothing more than illustrations, but just because of their sheer
beauty they enhanced the message in the text that followed.
This method will only work in certain types of
music, like for instance HardRock and Symphonic Rock. They won’t work in
music like HipHop or Funk. Of course, intro’s written using this method
will still be judged according to the general rules discussed in the previous
lesson, and as you can imagine, they can easily be condemned to hell for
not obeying to these rules. But if the composer did his job right he will
gladly be granted grace because of the exceptional beauty of the crime!
The showcase-method itself can be used in different
ways, resulting generally in two different types of intro’s:
For both types counts they will NOT work on A&R-managers
looking for the Next Sensation On the Block, but songwriters writing stuff
like this wouldn’t care too much about that. They are more interested in
writing a Concept-album like in the good old 70-ies or blasting away the
front-lines of the audience with arpeggio’s at full throttle! Now this
might sound like I’m mocking writing intro's like these, but the opposite
is true: I’m a great fan of intro’s like these and I believe some of the
best intro’s ever are written like this. But on the other hand, writing
intro’s using this method is full of risks.
Keep in mind the following remarks before attempting
to write intro’s using this method:
To put it short, don’t try this at home!
So far for the methods. Remember, there are lots
of them so feel free to experiment!
As we could see above, there are many different types
of intro’s, when you consider the way (or method) you can write them. But
intro’s can also be distinguished by the way they appear to us during performance.
Intro’s can appear in many shapes, and of course the way they sound is
the first thing that enables us to distinguish them from other intro’s.
Some of the differences in the way intro’s appear to us are due to the
method of writing used by the songwriter, but others are much more just
decisions made by the songwriter. For example, a songwriter can decide
to start a song very laid back, and thus choose only to use an accoustic
guitar for the intro before the rest of the band blasts off.
We’re talking about the actual “shape” of the
intro as we hear it and how could that better be explained then by using
some examples. This chapter I will discuss some (parts of) intro’s I wrote,
to show you some different forms an intro can have, what effect it can
have on your song and the pros and cons of that. The examples are mentioned
in a coïncidental order.
This example is taken from the song Live it Up, which
was also part of lesson 1. This song is built on one riff, which gives
plenty of room to the singer to put his emotion into the song. This main-riff
is used in the intro to make the hypnotizing effect of the riff even bigger.
Keep in mind while using intro’s like these to
keep them short, otherwise your song will easily become boring. Generally
this also counts for the whole song when based on a main riff.
As we saw while discussing “narrating intro’s” the
use of sound-effects can help built a certain mood. This is usually done
with the help of synthesizers, but of course you can use other instruments
to achieve this. This example, which is the intro of Alien Tune taken from
the Stag’s last cassette “Reset” features guitar-noises imitating strange,
space-like sounds. The drums enhance this spacial effect by using echo-like
patterns.
This intro is also an example of an intro that
starts with part of the band. Sometimes it helps focusing the attention
to hold back the rest of the band during the intro.
This example shows a rather daring effect, which
is the use of a strange rhythmic pattern. The unconventional beat of the
intro of The Last Unicorn helps drawing the attention because the audience
generally is used to more conventional intro’s. To avoid the side-effect
of confusing the audience too much the intro drops back with sort of an
intro within the intro. The vocal-part of the intro helps the audience
to “find the way back”.
It can be refreshing to have one or two songs
in your repetoire which use tricks like these in the intro, but be careful
not to use this trick too much; the audience might get bored or even worse,
numb!
Intro's like this full-speed Freaky-type intro of
Mr. Hide, one of my favourites, might be usefull to get the audience’s
attention back by force! The tight breaks help the guitar-riffs sound even
faster.
This type of intro also shouldn’t be used too
much for the same reason as the previous example. It’s also important not
to overdo things. Be sure there is a distinct structure in intro’s like
these because otherwise it might sound messy.
A song without a chorus can hardly be called a song. This rather bad statement is my personal opinion so if you don’t agree, that’s okay. But I would like to start this lesson with this statement, not only to wake you up, but rather because it’s one of the key-statements of this lesson. So if you don’t like songs without a chorus and never intend to write one, than probably you won’t feel at home in this class this month. I must say I never felt at home when I was at school but that’s another story... But if you do stick around, even if you don’t like to write choruses, maybe you will change your mind about them.
A chorus is more or less the heart of a song,
at least if it’s a good one of course. Why this is true is not as obvious
as it seems. People always tend to remember the chorus of a song, while
it may not even be the most interesting part of the song at all.
The easiest explanation of course is the fact
that the chorus is usually played a couple of times during a song. But
if this was the only reason why a chorus is the heart of most songs, how
come then that lots of choruses are easily forgotten, even if they are
played seemingly endless in the fadeout of a song? So there must be more
to it.
In this lesson we will see it’s hard to reveal
the secrets of a good chorus. Writing a good chorus may be more a matter
of the heart (something called talent?) than the mind. But since this counts
for songwriting in general, don’t be afraid; there are always some tricks
to learn to help those who have to struggle a little more then the lucky,
more talented ones. And believe me, most of us belong to the first group,
to put it stronger, even the most talented ones often join the struggling
crowd when they’re not inspired...
In lesson 5, we already saw some elements a good
chorus should have. Now we will take a closer look at these elements, by
discussing some rules you should follow if you want to write a good chorus.
These rules are:
Following these rules, you obey to the most important
rules of writing a good chorus. We will take a look at these rules in the
next paragraph. You can also click on the links to go directly to the discussion
of each of these rules.
What makes a chorus catchy? The easiest answer (for
me at least) is: listen to all those golden oldies. Almost all the classics
from the sixties and the seventies have catchy choruses. Of course The
Beatles were real masters at this, but it seems all the bands that became
famous in those days were able to write catchy choruses which seem to stick
in your mind forever. Who doesn’t know the chorus of Honky Tonk Women for
example...
Listening to examples is a great way to teach
yourself, and that counts for songwriting too! But there's something more
to say about this issue too.
So in general you could say the secret to write a catchy chorus is to make it sound logical.
In this lesson we already saw a chorus is one of
the most important parts of your song. In most cases, it's the part of
the song which will be played the most often. So it better be good! Another
trick to make your chorus a good chorus is to give it the treatment it
deserves! Since it's the main element of your song, whether you like it
or not, it should get all the attention it needs while you write it, to
gain all the attention it needs when you play it.
This brings me to a rather contradictionary issue:
writing songs is a very intuïtive job and that also counts for writing
choruses. But to obey to the rule that a chorus should contain elements
of the rest of the song, you should at least examine and evaluate your
music thoroughly. In mine opinion just writing your music from the heart
will generally result in the best music, but it's not very sensible only
to rely on your heart. Evaluating your music can be very useful and especially
when it comes to writing a chorus.
So no matter how you write, whether you write
straight from the heart or not, you will have to evaluate your song. Not
only because it will enhance your songwriting skills simply because you
are "forced" to think about what you have written, but also because "technical
rules" like these can only be followed by using technical means like evaluation.
Since a chorus is the part that will be played
and remembered most, it's the best place to "advertise" your song. Maybe
if you consider the chorus to be the advertisement of your song, you will
better understand the importance of putting elements of the rest of the
song into it, making it kind of an excerpt of your song. Some advantages
of doing so are:
But what elements should you take? This in fact is completely up to you and depends on the song you are writing. Generally it works fine to pick some of the more melodic parts of your song, simply because most people remember a melodic piece of music better than a monotone piece. And that's about all there is to say on this issue, but there are some pitfalls to look out for. These tips might help you avoiding them:
As you can see, this part of writing songs can be very tricky. Don't forget your skills will grow after every song you've finished, even the more technical skills that you'll need to write a good song, like evaluating your song and deciding what parts should be reflected into the chorus. I deliberatly used the term reflect, because this is one of the most vague issues of writing songs, making it one of the most difficult parts of it. But aren't things always getting more difficult when technique meets feelings?
The third important rule seems simple but, unfortunatly,
is not. Just like the second rule we discussed above, we will discover
it's again a matter of walking on the edge. You will have to carefully
find your way between what's good and what is bad, and there isn't a clear
path to follow. But again, experience is something you can't buy but which
comes free with endurance and perseverance. So just don't give up when
it's getting tough; your peaks will get higher and your downs won't be
as low as they used to be!
So a chorus shouldn't be an anti-climax. Clear!
But why is this rule not as simple as it seems? I will try to explain this.
If you follow the first two rules you won't too quickly end up with a chorus
that's an anti-climax, just because these two rules ensure your chorus
will be more or less the heart of the song. But still your chorus can become
an anti-climax, simply because another part of the song attrackts too much
the attention. A very impressive instrumental break can easily put the
chorus in the shadows.
So if your chorus is an anti-climax depends not
only on the chorus itself, but on the rest of the song too. To avoid this
disturbing effect, you will have to be very careful where to put that instrumental
break, charismatic leadvocal-line etc.
To make things even more complicated, you will
have to watch out for the chorus to become the climax of the song itself!
This can be disasterous to your song, because you will end up with a song
which repeats it's climax over and over again, with the result that you
end up with a song that doesn't seem to have a climax at all! So every
time you write a song you will have to deal with the problem to write a
strong, catchy chorus but on the other hand not to make it too strong....
This virtual contradictionary is hard to solve,
just listen to daily radio. But there are some ways to help you with this:
To give you some examples of the things I told you
in this lesson I have added four soundfiles to this lesson, which can BE
listened to just by clicking on the links. The files are all recorded in
the AU-format (PCM 8 bits 8kHz Mono).
I will briefly discuss each example and will
try to show you how the above is implemented into the examples. I also
will point at some tricks I used in these choruses. Don't forget there
are numerous examples to come up with, each with different combinations
and interpretations of the rules we discussed in this lesson. Just consider
these soundfiles as my contribution to what this is all about: music and
the fun of it!
The first example is the chorus of Alien
Tune, taken from the live-recorded third cassette of The Stag, Reset. Lesson
6 included the intro of this spacy song so maybe it's not a complete new-one
for some of you.
This version of the chorus is played at the end
of the song, and to make it stand out to the other choruses just because
it's the last one, the third line is added to it, which is actually a repetition
of the first line. The original chorus has only three lines, this final
one has four.
Another trick I used in this chorus is as simple
as efficiënt to draw the attention a chorus needs. I used an effects-processor
to distort the lead-vocals. Keeping the original lead-vocaltrack and putting
the distorted vocals behind it creates a very dramatic effect. A band like
ZZ-Top used a trick like this in their song Manic Mechanic.
The next example is also taken from Reset,
and is more melodic than the previous example. This will make it a lot
easier to remember this chorus as you will probably notice, but this of
course is also due to the fact that parts of the lyrics are repeated a
few times.
Another trick used in this chorus to make it
the eye-catcher of this song are the backing-vocals, which answer the questions
"asked" by the lead-singer. Using several backing-vocals and making them
"fade out" into the lead-vocals enhances the choir-effect. Recorded in
a real studio in stead of the rehearsal-room this can sound real impressive.
Please note the sound-sample starts with the
last line of the verse, which features a break to focus the attention to
the chorus even more.
Another track taken from Reset, so recorded
live at the rehearsal-room of The Stag, is the chorus of The Widow's Game.
This chorus is an example of a miniature of the entire song. It contains
parts of the main riff of the song, but the lead-vocals switch to a melodic,
strong line, while they stick more to the rhythm of the song during the
verses.
The final example of this lesson features
the first track of The Last Season, the first cassette of The Stag. This
chorus is short and melodic, yet it sounds simple. A chorus like this is
hard to forget, whether you like it or not.
In this particular case, the trick I used to
make the chorus stand out to the rest of the song is the addition of backing-vocals
(again) and a more prominent role for the keyboards in comparison to the
verses. Changes like this are great to draw the attention to the chorus.
For more, visit the Free Music Education Center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|